Claviformispora X. L. Xu & C. L. Yang, in Xu, Yang, Jeewon, Wanasinghe, Liu & Xiao, MycoKeys 70 (2020)

Index Fungorum number: IF 557395, Facesoffungi number: FoF14621

Etymology – Name reflects the claviform ascospores.

Description – Saprobic on dead branches.

Sexual morph: Stromata solitary or gregarious, black, erumpent. Ascomata solitary or aggregated, immersed, subglobose, slightly raised blistering areas with a central ostiole with periphyses. Peridium outer cells merge with the host tissues, composed of pale to dark brown cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium comprising hyaline, septate paraphyses, longer than asci, wider at the base, tapering towards the apex. Asci 8-spored, cylindrical to cylindric-clavate, unitunicate, short pedicel- late, apically rounded, with a doughnut-shaped, refractive, J- apical ring. Ascospores over-lapping uniseriate or 2-seriate, clavated with a thin pedicellate, 1-celled, hyaline, without appendage and refringent bands, smooth-walled.

Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Type speciesClaviformispora phyllostachydis X. L. Xu & C. L. Yang

NotesClaviformispora resembles Neolinocarpon in having immersed ascomata and ostiole with periphyses, but differs in forming aggregated ascomata, cylindric-clavate, short pedicellate asci, clavate ascospores with thin pedicel and without septa-like bands and appendages, whereas the ascospores of Neolinocarpon and Linocarpon (Linocarpaceae) species are usually filiform with refringent bands and appendages (Hyde 1992b, 1997; Konta et al. 2017). The nature of the ascospore appendages appears to be phylogenetically significant for intergeneric delineation as has been seen in other studies (Poonyth et al. 2000; Jeewon et al; 2003, Thongkantha et al. 2003; Cai et al. 2004; Konta et al. 2017), but this warrants further investigations with more sampling and fresh collections of Neolinocarpon and Linocarpon. Differences in morphology between these genera in Linocarpaceae are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2. Morphological comparison of Linocarpon, Neolinocarpon and Claviformispora.

MorphologyLinocarponNeolinocarponClaviformispora
(Type: L. pandani)(Type: N. globosicarpum)(Type: C. phyllostachydis)
StromataAbsentAbsentSolitary or aggregated, comprising elliptical areas and large black areas, with

slit-like openings

AscomataSolitary, superficial, subglobose, comprising black, dome-shaped, raised

blistering areas, central ostiole

Solitary, deeply immersed, oval to globose, with central raised, dark, shiny

papilla, central ostiole with periphyses

Solitary or aggregated, deeply immersed, subglobose, slightly raised blistering

areas, central ostiole with periphyses

PeridiumTextura angularisTextura angularisTextura angularis
HamatheciumHyaline, septate paraphyses, longer

than asci

Hyaline, septate paraphyses, longer

than asci

Hyaline, septate paraphyses, longer

than asci

AsciCylindrical, unitunicate, a small non- amyloid apical ringLong cylindrical, pedicellate, unitunicate, an oblong to wedge-shaped, refractive, apical ring and some with a

refractive circular body below

Cylindrical to cylindric-clavate, unitunicate, pedicellate, doughnut- shaped, refractive, J- apical ring
AscosporesFiliform, aseptate, hyaline or pale- yellowish in mass, parallel or spiral, with appendage and refringent septum-like bands or absentFiliform, aseptate, hyaline or pale- yellowish in mass, parallel or spiral, with apical appendages and refringent bands or absentClavate, thin pedicellate, aseptate, hyaline, parallel, no appendage and refringent band
Asexual morphOnly found in L. appendiculatum and

L. elaeidis, conidiophore arising from the aerial mycelium, conidiogenous cells phialidic, smooth, translucent brown,

conidia clavate to fusiform, straight or slightly curved or slightly sinuous,

unicellular, smooth, colourless

UndeterminedUndetermined
OthersColonies on MEA and PDA growing slowlyColonies on MEA growing slowly. Ascospores on MEA produced appressoria-like structures at each tip of

germ tube, only found in N. rachidis

Colonies on PDA grow faster
ReferencesHyde (1992b), Konta et al. (2017),

Thongkantha et al. (2003)

Hyde et al. (2019), Senwanna et al.

(2018), Hyde et al. (1998)

This study